2012 is apparently the year of great shifts in the world of the United Methodist Church. Though there are a couple days still to come in our every four year gathering, we have already seen some systemic shifts in how the church is run.
One theme is becoming very clear to me in all of this, and that is the consolidation of power into the hands of the privileged few. Most noticeably, this is demonstrated in new organizational plan that was just approved today. I honestly haven’t had time to even fully read the plan let alone digest it. So, instead, I want to take a moment and comment on another dramatic change that took place only yesterday.
For over 50 years the United Methodist Church has guaranteed ordained elders an appointment as pastor. Outside of major misconduct, it was nearly impossible to “fire” someone from the ministry, you could only move them around. Now that has changed. Guaranteed appointment is gone, and a full time ministry position is now a privilege, not a right.
Straight off, I need to say that I do support this, and have for some time. I know there are very real arguments to be made that this is a bad move for female and minority pastors. I agree wholly with that. However, we are literally awash in ineffective clergy that, for whatever reason, don’t respond to the carrot. So, its time we had a stick.
That being said, I want to go back to my main point about power. This is now the world that I, as an elder, live in:
1) I have no real say in where I serve. I am assigned a position based on the will of my Bishop alone. Book of discipline (2008) paragraph 338: …ordained elders are appointed by the bishop to fields of labor. All ordained elders shall accept and abide by these appointments. Say what you want about the cabinet and consulting the churches, the buck starts and stops with the bishop.
2) Under the new rules, just approved, the bishop has the right to appoint an elder in full connection and good standing to a less than full time appointment. Or, no appointment at all with the agreement of the small executive group of the board of ordained ministry.
3) Finally, and a piece mission form the debate as far as I saw, is that the bishop of your current conference must approve any transfer to another conference.
So what does this mean? It means one, one, person is invested with the power to effectively end the career of any current elder. Not only in their geographic area, but globally.
So now I have to ask myself, who do I work for? Sure, my paycheck may come drawn on the church back account, but they don’t have the authority to get rid of me. So do I work for them? Do I work for the Bishop? Of course I should say I work for God, and I do. But, I’ve invested years and tens of thousands of dollars in my career.
Is this the appropriate assurance from the organization of the church?
We have now created a system whose response to that question is “trust your bishop.”
Sure. But then the question is, will my bishop trust me?
program has become about much more than just speaking or preaching, but instead is a class about being a leader within the church.






